Rights of Way
The other type of right of way is what’s called a prescriptive right of way and a prescriptive right of way is one you get over time because you have used it for so long. Generally this type of right of way is most commonly seen with laneways leading to a part of somebody’s farm and traveling over somebody else’s land. The position in relation to these rights of way (prescriptive rights of way) is that you can use the right of way for the purpose for which it has been used over many years. But if it’s the case that someone wants to change the use of a property (for example by building a house) then they won’t have a right of way to use the laneway for that purpose.
In general the position regarding rights of way and the use of them is that if the document is silent as to what the rights and obligations of each party are (or indeed if there is no document at all), then the court will make certain assumptions. The first assumption they’ll make is that if someone has the use of a right of way then they have a right to maintain that right of way so that they can continue to use it, but they do not have the right to either alter it or change it or widen it in any way. Then in relation to the person over whose land the right of way travels, their obligation is to make sure that the right of way isn’t blocked. For example, if there are gates on the right of way then they will provide keys to the person who has the right to travel up that laneway.
Boundaries of farmland
In the event of a dispute, a number of sources of information can be used to determine farm boundaries. Land registration is the first step. Each parcel of ground is digitised and stored in the land registry for the vast majority of the country. However, these maps should be regarded as indicative rather than definitive. Secondly, title deeds, which are held by farmers or have been registered with the land registry, will be a source of information. Lastly, customs, practices, and presumptions made by a court will provide information. This is illustrated by the hedge and ditch rule, in which the court assumes, unless contrary evidence is presented, that a ditch, its banks, and its hedge are all located on the farmer's land.
A court will also consider the behaviour of the parties, so if for example one farmer has maintained the boundary for many years, a court may assume that it belongs to him.
Depending on how the court decides, either two farmers own all of it or each farmer owns up to the middle of it. Maintenance of a boundary (a hedge or a boundary ditch) is subject to various rules.